I occasionally get questions from people on why I'm an atheist. So, I thought I'd write a bit about it.
Type of atheist
As
I see it, there are two main types of atheist. There's the absolute
atheist, that flat out denies that there is a god or gods. And then
there's the agnostic atheist, that simply doesn't believe in any god or
gods, without denying their possible existence. I see myself as an agnostic
atheist, as, the way I see it, there is no way I or anyone else can
prove the non-existence of any kind of deity. It's highly improbable
that one (or more) exist, but that's as close as we can get. So, the way I see it, it's just as foolish to deny the existence of deities as it is to believe in them.
Upbringing
As
far as I can remember, religion was never a part of our life when I
grew up. Neither of my parents are, as far as I know, religious in any
way. The biggest proof I have of this, is that neither me nor my
siblings were, uh, baptized? Not sure if that's the correct term, but
you probably understand what I mean. Either way... I can't remember
really hearing much about religion, or even really knowing what religion
or christianity was, until I started school. It was a non-issue for us, and I'm thankful for that.
School and the bible
I don't think I learned
about the bible, or the stories within it, until we started having
christianity classes in school. I may have heard some of the stories
before that, like the one about Noah's Ark, but most likely thought of
them as fantasy. I can't really remember. But what I do remember is that
once we started learning about it in school, I couldn't really
understand how some people believed those stories to be true. It seemed
so ridiculous to me. They were nice stories, at least the ones we read
back then, but nothing more.
My
dad eventually pulled me out of the christianity class and got me over
on an alternative class that focused on all religions and other
non-religious life-views. Unfortunately, when we moved to my mom, I had
to go back to regular christianity classes. I don't know why, but I
suspect it had something to do with the fact that my then step-father
was a christian. Whatever the case, it didn't take long before the
christianity classes were replaced by something more similar to the
alternative classes country-wide.
Observing the world
As
I grew older, and payed more attention to the world around me, the
concept of a god or gods seemed even more ridiculous. Particularly a
benevolent and all-powerful god. There are so much evil and misfortune
in the world, it's impossible for me to understand how anyone can
believe that such a thing exist.
If a potential god truly was
benevolent, why would he turn his back on all the people around the
world that live in pain, fear and stress 24/7, only because they were
accidentally born in a region of the world that teaches them to believe
in another god? There's no logic in that. On the other hand, if a potential god is either not benevolent or not all-powerful, what is the point in believing in it?
So, yeah. Based on the state of the world today, there is either no god to believe in, or no point in believing in whatever god there is.
Evolution and biology
Learning
about evolution, and subsequently a bit about biology through Richard
Dawkins, it became even clearer to me that there's no point in believing
in a god. As you know, the bible teaches that all creatures were
created and have always been the same. Looking at evolution, there's no
doubt that this is false. Particularly when you look at vestigial
structures or organs, which is parts of a species that used to be
important but no longer have a function.
In humans, the most
"famous" examples of vestigial structures are the appendix, which were
once used to digest grass, leaves, etc, and the tailbone, which were
once an actual tail.
In animals, some of the most famous examples of vestigial structures are;
- Leg-bones in whales, a remnant from when the whales ancestors still had actual legs and walked on land.
- Wings on ostriches, emus, penguins, and other birds that can no longer fly.
- Eyes that can no longer actually see in cave-dwelling fish and salamanders.
Neither of these things
serve any purpose anymore in these creatures, so if humans and animals
were created perfectly, why are they there?
Absence of proof
Other than holy books
and texts, which is only good for self-referencing proof, there is no
proof of any sort that there is any kind of god or gods. To this day I
haven't heard or read about a single proposed proof that can't be
explained by other causes or pure chance. Particularly the argument that
the Earth have "perfect" conditions for life and therefore must have
been designed.
There's an uncountable
amount of planets in the universe; It's purely accidental that our
planet was able to sustain what we know as life. And to say that our
planet have perfect conditions for life, is just plain wrong. It has good, but far from perfect, conditions for, again, what we know as life. On the best days we have good conditions for life. But most of the time there are some kind of extreme condition for someone, somewhere, who are barely able to hang on, and often can not.
Also, there is nothing to suggest that there aren't other kinds of
life on one or more of the uncountable other planets in the universe, life that
we might not be able to recognize as life. In which case, there's nothing perfect or special about our planet or our version of life. And if we are the only life in the universe? What would then be the point for a creator to create everything else? Why is it there?
If anything, the universe is proof of the non-existence of gods.
Multiple and geographic religions
Then, finally, there's
the problem of multiple religions. If there actually is one religion
that is true, and one god or pantheon of gods that actually exist, why
are there so many different religions around the world? Why is there
doubt about what religion is the true religion? Why do so many millions
of people believe that one religion is true, and so many other millions
of people believe that another religion is true? It makes absolutely no
sense.
And, of course, the
problem of geographic religion. In most cases, what religion you belong
to is decided by what part of the world you were born in, or what part
of the world your family originally came from. If you had been born in
another family, in another part of the world, you would've had an
entirely different view of the world, and an entirely different
religious view. The fact that no religious people is able to see that,
baffles me.
So, yeah. That's much of the reason why I'm an atheist.
Pretty in-depth, good read. Would just like to add that the term "agnostic atheist" is quite correct, but you can also use "gnostic atheist" for the certain kind.
ReplyDeleteIn my eyes, being a gnostic atheist is inherently contradictory, but there are certainly some of them out there.
Thanks, man. =)
ReplyDelete